- Lid sinds
- 11 januari 2003
- Berichten
- 14.508
wat vinden we van de key tek cts 2000 wavetable synth
ergens op mp ; heb m al gecontacted
astie al een beetje op de esq1 lijkt [ook analoge structur .....verder
dan ist een leuke synth lijkt
key tek weird ding 3 lfo,s ook
some info ; http://weltenschule.de/TableHooters/Amstrad_CKX100.html
Yeah, it is kinda, or like the Prophet VS, but none of those synths can completely replicate the functionality. Possibly it was inspired by the Synclavier's resynthesis functions: I read that the Synclavier can perform an FFT of a sample, then the user can pick several points on the resulting spectral display, and the sound will be played back on the FM voices by interpolating between these points (called "timbre windows" I think). Clearly this is what the designers had in mind, to cheaply resynthesize instrument sounds instead of storing entire samples.
Conceptually this is great, especially to crossfade together vibraphone waveforms with vocal waveforms, etc. Anyway the sound of the CTS-2000 means that it's not very useful. Even the raw saw/square waveforms sound somehow really bad, I'm not sure if it's the waveforms themselves that sound bad, or the M114S chips, or some poorly-designed analog circuitry, but it's just unpleasant to listen to.
whooo not good
en deze ; http://www.geocities.com/diffused_light/stuff/cts2000.html
zijn der mensen met ervaringen met deze rare eend

ergens op mp ; heb m al gecontacted
astie al een beetje op de esq1 lijkt [ook analoge structur .....verder
dan ist een leuke synth lijkt
key tek weird ding 3 lfo,s ook
some info ; http://weltenschule.de/TableHooters/Amstrad_CKX100.html
Yeah, it is kinda, or like the Prophet VS, but none of those synths can completely replicate the functionality. Possibly it was inspired by the Synclavier's resynthesis functions: I read that the Synclavier can perform an FFT of a sample, then the user can pick several points on the resulting spectral display, and the sound will be played back on the FM voices by interpolating between these points (called "timbre windows" I think). Clearly this is what the designers had in mind, to cheaply resynthesize instrument sounds instead of storing entire samples.
Conceptually this is great, especially to crossfade together vibraphone waveforms with vocal waveforms, etc. Anyway the sound of the CTS-2000 means that it's not very useful. Even the raw saw/square waveforms sound somehow really bad, I'm not sure if it's the waveforms themselves that sound bad, or the M114S chips, or some poorly-designed analog circuitry, but it's just unpleasant to listen to.
whooo not good
en deze ; http://www.geocities.com/diffused_light/stuff/cts2000.html
zijn der mensen met ervaringen met deze rare eend

schu .. i.. vuhhhh
