OORzaak
Hangend lid
Ziet er uit als nieuw 170 euro ?
of ruil tegen.................?
Johan Nilsson ( ) writes:
I like my D-20. It sounds very similar to the D-50. I don't use the sequencer because computer sequencers are much better. The synth is the same as the Roland D-10 so the patches are 100% compatible. The D-110 module is almost the same but I think that there are some differences.
dirk sontowski ,am richtsberg 6, 35039 marburg, germany : having an 8-jears old "vintage" synthesizer it is still fun to work with .the analog qualities of the d20 are probably under-estimated, but if you put some time into sound programming the results are very convincing. there are 2 points that over-shadow the result: 1. the built-in sequenzer is not that usefull especially a copy function would be very nice ! 2. the keyboard-quality is rather poor. though i bought it as secound hand,and the first owner totured it obviously very much, the quality of roland keyboards is not the best. yamaha does it better! never the less i would buy the d20 again cause typical trance-sounds are possible to get with it. it does'nt have to be one of these overprized, difficult to get , not midified and unreliable dinos! Synthsite Comment: It's very simillar to the D110 module but with a sequencer. Good lo budget synth but you will need to work at the sounds a bit. There were a lot of sounds for it floating around at the time of release because of the simillarity to the d10,d110 etc I think Roland shifted a lot of these units. The sysex implementation is cool, it's possible to dump the edit buffer so you never had to store the sounds in memory.
of ruil tegen.................?
Johan Nilsson ( ) writes:
I like my D-20. It sounds very similar to the D-50. I don't use the sequencer because computer sequencers are much better. The synth is the same as the Roland D-10 so the patches are 100% compatible. The D-110 module is almost the same but I think that there are some differences.
dirk sontowski ,am richtsberg 6, 35039 marburg, germany : having an 8-jears old "vintage" synthesizer it is still fun to work with .the analog qualities of the d20 are probably under-estimated, but if you put some time into sound programming the results are very convincing. there are 2 points that over-shadow the result: 1. the built-in sequenzer is not that usefull especially a copy function would be very nice ! 2. the keyboard-quality is rather poor. though i bought it as secound hand,and the first owner totured it obviously very much, the quality of roland keyboards is not the best. yamaha does it better! never the less i would buy the d20 again cause typical trance-sounds are possible to get with it. it does'nt have to be one of these overprized, difficult to get , not midified and unreliable dinos! Synthsite Comment: It's very simillar to the D110 module but with a sequencer. Good lo budget synth but you will need to work at the sounds a bit. There were a lot of sounds for it floating around at the time of release because of the simillarity to the d10,d110 etc I think Roland shifted a lot of these units. The sysex implementation is cool, it's possible to dump the edit buffer so you never had to store the sounds in memory.
